|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
|
|
| yea its been a long while since i last wrote. during this period of time a number of you has asked about this site: will i write again? thanks for the support. but when i look back at my past entries, i realize that they are mostly some angry complaints, some young and loud cynicism. it is always easy to look at the bad side and complain - it gives us excuses right? that being said, however, this is the very reason i decided to venture myself, in this very new environment (i didnt even notice that the interface had changed), to write again, and to appeal to you guys: cheer up friends. why does everyone sound so unhappy on their blogs? is this a place, as i boldly claimed a couple of years ago, in which emotions are exaggerated? or is this a place where true emotions are revealed? sometimes reality is such a harsh place that we lose the ability to express ourselves through normal channels, and have to use ways as such. but we all know it is not a healthy way, mentally and emotionally. look on the bright side, and think positively. i am not offering solutions, and i dont think i am very good at cheering people up anyway, so i might as well stop here. take care, and be brave. | | |
| the light shower welcomes us to the last day in osaka, japan. once in a short while the summer breeze sweeps through the quad-like square. a prospective chicago boy munches the smoked salmon sandwiches in his hand and says, 'breeze? its freezing man.' next to him is a wharton realist, who, by his nature, had rather spend the time finishing his breakfast... and the last one is myself, enjoying the privilege to *starbucks* with two future wall street gems, who people will probably dream to *starbucks* with in ten years' time.
anyway, having salmon sandwiches and hot latte for breakfast is by no means a protest against japan, its just that we have nowhere to go breakfast. in fact, we all love the four days spent there. while i cannot really sum it up with a couple of adjectives or sentences, i do wish to share the many great moments on a really great trip i have had since a long time ago.
not sure if its a PRACTICAL JOKE by the airline - our trip did not have an easy start. our flight was delayed by an hour because of some problem with the engines. that definitely disrupted our itinerary. when we got to the osaka airport, we almost had to run to catch the bus. but of course we could not really blame the airplane alone - even after settling down, we were still walking around in circles in the jr / subway stations. we even decided to buy three bottles of liquor but not a bottle opener.
i went to japan with great expectation of the FOOD there, and we indeed had several really great meals. to name a few there was the famous sashimi sushi - where the fat and juicy fish is big enough to wrap around the rice (okay you have no clue what i am talking about). there was also the various japanese dumplings topped with sukiyaki sauce, as well as deep fried pork chop served with medium cooked sunny side up. we also had the opportunity to have the famous cuttlefish balls. all of these were something you dont see often in hong kong. however, there were also times when we experienced the difference in tastes between hong kong-ers and japanese - such as the tasteless ramen and the tempura which costs more than 7000 yan each.
none of us are big FASHION chasers but we all notice that japanese teenagers were way more fashionable than hong kong's, or at least they appeared to be. instead of plain t shirts, levi jeans and sports shoes, we saw a lot of painted shirts, layered clothings, gold pointed-shoes etc. the girls used loads of make up, and looked unbelievably good - disappointedly none of them seems to be interested in us, three pathetic and desperate geeks, even with our aviator sunglasses on.
the visited TOURIST SPOTS on our trip were mainly temples and the osaka castles. quite breath-taking, but in a literal sense - we actually had to walk so damn much to get to each of them. and with no pun intented, the scenes were not as great as expected - we had all seen something better. the temple columns, verandas and 'rooftop' were spectacular, but lacked a sense of originality. in china i have seen something similar, but everything was ornated with much more details. on the contrary, the natural scenery and some non-tourist spots were unexpectedly sensational - we walked through a bamboo grove and saw sevearl tree gardens...the local households and small stores we passed by on our way were also full of traditional japanese colours, reflecting the old side of the country and its culture.
its funny how japanese PEOPLE always expect you to know their language, even after knowing you are from china. the other reason is probably their english is too bad. for most popular tourist areas, the only language found is japanese. however, the people were definitely very helpful and sincere, who provide great service, good smile and convoluted japanese. beisdes, you can also tell that they are a group of very disciplined people by seeing how every staff smiling to you, saying same stuff to each customer, taxi drivers wearing uniform. and perhaps it is this kind of discipline and order-oriented culture that gives rise to multinational like toyota.
finally, despite the vivid description above, the greatest thing was being with two really awesome friends. and i guess thats what made the trip so amazing - we have known each other for seven years and more importantly, share the common interests - sometimes intellectual, sometimes funny, and sometimes horny. tonight the wharton dude will be on his way to beijing, while the chicago boy will start his another stock-craze investigation. (me being sick because of the flight). 'back to reality, separate ways' is always true. but i do look forward to the trip ten years later to osaka japan, the time when we will be way different but way similar - with the same spirits, mentalities and life goals.
the trip was great, filled with laughter, vending machines, jokes, coins and oh, av dvds too. at this point i would like to sincerely thank mr. li luk and mr. sampson lau for providing the best company; mr. armas lam, mr. esmond fong and justin lee for helping our early planning. all of you rock.
cheers, and take care. sometime later, when we meet again at a crossroad, it will be even better. or should i say, itd better be even better. | | |
| dealing with reality there is still a wide gap between the ability to deal with reality and the outward capability. i have had the opportunity, and privilege, to work with many outstanding individuals. all of them are bright, sharp, quick-witted and determined - talk to them about john nash's game theories and they know it, probably up to a graduate school level - give them a most complicated calculus question and they finish it, with a simpler approach than the model answer, in no time. but somehow they are the clique of people who cannot deal with the reality. they go to highly recognized universities, have internships with prestigious multi-nationals, and possess incredibly impressive credentials - like starting a limited company or organizing a massive charity show in high school. (no intended target, and the fact is i might also be one) but they lack the execution skill. they just cannot get things done. things as easy as having a proper estimated budget or timetable for each project are overlooked by them. and all they do is, sit there, bullshit a while about why we should not have a budget because inflation might come, and how plato established the pessimistic equilibrium which proves we should prepare for contingencies instead of explicit tangible plans. like rock stars, they sound complicated and deep, are envied of, extremely good looking, but cannot do anything a little complicated themsevles. in short, they are a bunch of pedantic, highly educated and spoiled kids. these kids can fool most people for while. but mind you, just a while. when it comes to reality, it is about getting things done. it is about performance. lack of a sense of responsibility is probably one big reason. we have witnessed too many goal-oriented people who lied to their friends in order to move up and make themselves stand out. they dont care about how other people or the society as a whole are affected by what they do - not because they are unaware, but they just dont give a damn. getting a great resume is more important than organizing a show and losing a hundred thousand bucks of finance. they are ambitious and are great leaders (because they usually manage to manipulate and motivate many people to work for them). but once they have achieved their goals, their enthusiasm fades out as well. their mentality changes from that of a great advocate to a wont-care-less third party. or in a deeper level, their mentality never changed - as a bunch of greatly cost-effiective economists, they embrace adam smith's self interest theory to a too great extent. in my old school i witnessed a lot of politics, most performed adeptly by those kids. what short sightedness! by gaining some trivial advantages in certain areas, they are breaking the camel's back of many others as well. things like deceiving one's classmates about what one writes in his/her application essays, talking on one's friend's back just to gain recognition from another, or feigning determination when running for posts but slacking off after getting it, are perfect examples to demonstrate the lack of responsibility of the kids. as a result, because they never actually have to get things done, they never learnt how to. days go by and their ability to execute the easiest things begins to deterioate and eventually extincts. they then evolve into life-less species who only care about SAT scores or summer internship instead of genuine life goals they should have envisioned - the long term plan. personally i know many 9A-ers who cannot do stuff like photocopying, using a washing machines, and who are not creative nor flexible. people say playing smart can often avoid a lot of donkey work. right now, it seems those kids are the winning ones - but today i have another goal: play smart, but also play with morals, values and class. facing and dealing with the reality is probably the first step to achieve the above high standard. and the reason for my hope to change? i just dont wanna be one of them. | | |
| hey, things were actually happening over here, just that i was taking a break from writing. the summer vacation has been surprisingly fulfilling so far - well at least compared to what i had expected. basically after the exam there were a lot of partying, catching up with good old friends (yet still counting down the days until next reunion), trying to force myself to stay up later in night to feel the so-called holiday indulgence and staying in bed for half an hour more for the same reason. also had several dinner with future schoolmates, st. pauls friends. then it was the graduation ceremony, when i gave a speech which embarassed even myself (its not easy mind you)...a lot of photo taking too. last night was the prom, which was not really a prom because of the lack of people and overall reserved atmosphere that prevails our school. and oh of course the after parties. while if you ask me to recount what actually happened, i will say nothing too fancy, but they were fun. maybe its just having a little drink and jerking hips and imitating house music. or maybe its just the presence of friends. oh yes friends, what an interesting invention by the creator - the first day i went to the school, all i thought about was work hard and get into a good college. i didnt actually think about the people there - plus, you know, as a good boy developed in a traditional and conservative family and local school, it was quite a change. i was not very willing to conform either. however two years later, i am really not sure whether i have changed, and blended with the newfound culture, or things were actually not as complicated and conflicting as i first had imagined. yes, if there is one bad habit i am sure i will never get rid of, it is probably the tendency to think to much. of course, friendship here is not just about hard liquor and bob sinclar's rock the party. before i came to fis, i thought international school people were always wasted, having too much party, swearing too much, but one thing i didnt realize was that they are actually the same. partying is just like, as we local people say, hea-ing together. besides, although i used to have the impression that international people tried to stay cool and unapproachable, and how hot chicks being pretencious, it is actually not true. it is all about putting your guard down and being yourself. while in spite of going to fis, i have never forgotten about my friends in spcc. embracing two different lifestyles has only let me treasured each of them even more. i seriously enjoy chilling out with my good old st. paulians, who were the worst competitors in school (because they knock you out even if you have studied your ass off) at a starbucks and talk about everything from adam smith vs. karl marz economics theories to the latest production of tera patrick. nerdy you say, but thats the kind of life we were brought up to, and well, i dont feel any shame to admit it. yet i also love chilling with the fis people, seeing how they imitate weird dance moves and come up with their own. i dont feel that there is a different in any so-called intellectual level between the two, its just different lifestyles i guess. if you look at my life, plot it out on a graph paper, you can say i am unlucky and at the same time lucky too. thats because i guess it all depends on how you look at it. instead of holding a myopic and cynical point of view, i would rather just say i am honestly thankful for everything that you guys have made possible. cheers, and all the best in future. | | |
| no one but heidi this is not really a spoiler, it is just a blind guess of mine about tv show the apprentice. heidi will win, not because she is a good leader, or she has streaks of winning records. she will win because she fits the criteria of this season's winning candidate...
just a side note before i go on to explain my guess: i think the whole process of donald trump's 15-week interview provides a good platform to show how employment actually works in business world, especially for highly paid position: it is extremely subjective and that conventional threads of evaluating a 'leader' do not actually play a role. instead, think of it as a person choosing someone he likes to work with. being too smart (hence outsmarting your boss) and intimidating is not always good. bear in mind that what the boss says he is looking for is not exactly what he wants. i.e. in the case of donald trump - a motivated result driven individual. and an instant paragon will be frank the hardcore candidate who never gives up. but come to think about it, we all know frankie will be packing home soon - he is too loud, too passionate...too much of everything, which makes his entire existence too comical.
so back to the point: why will heidi win? its because of several reasons: 1. she has done reasonably well (one loss and several wins as project manager) 2. she is a female 3. she looks rather good 4. she has the charisma...and its the combination of these four elements, in this particular situation, that will crown her queen.
of course, to get the job one needs results. but not the best results. having a good winning record is probably the same as winning as a teamplayer all the time - it is like sitting SAT for american colleges, once you get beyond a certain mark (say 2250), no one actually cares. so since heidi has in fact done a good job guiding her team to victories. she already has attained the 'basic bargaining roundtable' to ask for a job. frank will never get the job because he has a poor record (one trial one loss as pm) stefani will never get the job because of no record (zero trial zero loss as pm)
heidi is also a female (duh, you say, but wait)...and looking at previous episodes we realize that there is only one female who has ever got the job. the rest are all guys. if donald trump lets a guy win this time again, he will risk himself being seen as a sexist. and in business, having a pleasant image is vital. this kind of 'anti-discrimination reflex' is also evident when he hired randolf, an african american two episodes before. remember folks, this is a public tv show. trump is fully aware what he does is broadcast. while of course trump will not just hire a woman. but in this particular situation, since heidi has made it to the bargaining roundtable, and trump might not be sure whether any females will also make it in future episodes, he will take this chance.
thirdly, heidi is also rather good looking. and of course i do not mean red hot kind of good looking. but she is not short, not chubby, and her figures are well proportioned. if instead she was a overweighed, middle-aged female, she will lose all her chances. one does not like to be led by someone who looks bad. subconsciously, a person takes symmetrical, well proportioned outlook as sign of good health and well balanced life. if you are opulent, people think you have no life other than work. if you are too skinny, people think you cannot handle pressure. heidi also fits this criteria. so she passes. nicole, however, will not win even with good results, because of her raspy, harsh voice and dyed, slightly unkempt hairdos.
then you ask, how about james? he is minority, and he is not too bad looking. but that comes to the most important aspect: charisma. james does not have any charisma. he is someone you would hire to work for heidi, instead him leading heidi. of course, heidi is perhaps not the best leader: a rather self-centred person, who does not communicate a lot with her teammates. however, in doing so, she manages to exert an impression of authority. she delegates, and then she goes mind her own part. yet you know you cannot screw up on your part otherwise you would be responsible, and hence fired. working for her gives a lot of pressure. but in any organizations, no workers are happy. they know they are better than their 'project managers' but somehow working for them. thats the reason: the leaders possess the charisma.
charisma is something 50% inherent and 50% created. if you dont have it, you gotta work your ass off to just be the same as one who possesses this natural gift. but if you have it, and manages to utilize and make good use of it, you can make it to full capacity easily. heidi, right now, is the most charismatic candidate i would say.
so i conclude that heidi would win. and i am pretty sure too. wanna bet?
p.s. in case you know the result, please please do NOT reveal anything and be an evil spoiler.
cheers, jason edit: phew, luckily no one made a bet. | | |
|